Map the real process
Sat with the staff who perform the work and documented what actually happens, including every workaround. The real process had nine handoffs against the procedure's five steps.
A referral process with nine handoffs, three places the same data was entered, and a two-week wait before a client heard anything. Mapping the real process showed why.
This is a representative engagement — an illustrative profile showing how this CAMPBELL engagement works, what it produces, and the kind of change it creates. It is composed to demonstrate our methodology and does not describe a specific client or report a specific organization’s results.
Clients referred to the organization waited an average of two weeks between referral and first contact. Staff knew the wait was too long; nobody could say exactly where the time went.
The written intake procedure described a five-step process. Staff described something considerably more involved, with workarounds they had developed to compensate for a form that did not capture what eligibility review actually needed.
The same client information was entered into the referral log, the case management system, and a program-specific spreadsheet. An auditor had raised documentation consistency in each of the last two reviews.
Every CAMPBELL engagement is delivered through the CAMPBELL 6D Method™ — Discover, Define, Design, Deliver, Demonstrate, Drive. Each step below is tagged with the phase it belongs to.
Sat with the staff who perform the work and documented what actually happens, including every workaround. The real process had nine handoffs against the procedure's five steps.
Traced where work waited. The bottleneck was a single eligibility approver who reviewed every referral regardless of complexity, and who had other full-time responsibilities.
Removed three unnecessary handoffs, set risk-based approval thresholds so routine referrals no longer required the same review as complex ones, and made the case management system the authoritative record so data was entered once.
Redesigned it to capture what eligibility review actually needed, which eliminated the follow-up contacts that had been adding days.
Documented separation of duties and approval thresholds, and set a records retention standard that addressed the audit observations.
Named a process owner, set cycle time and error rate as standing measures, and scheduled an annual review.
Process work is the clearest application of Map in the CAMPBELL Model™. The documented process and the performed process are almost never the same, and the gap between them is where the root cause lives.
Illustrative of the change this engagement is designed to produce.
Removing handoffs and routing routine referrals around the single approver cut the delay between referral and first contact from weeks to days.
Designating one authoritative system eliminated duplicate entry and the discrepancies it produced.
Documented separation of duties, approval thresholds, and retention standards resolved the findings that had recurred in prior reviews.
A named owner, two standing measures, and a review date meant degradation would be visible rather than gradual and unnoticed.
If you recognised your own situation here, let’s talk about it. A consultation is free, carries no obligation, and starts where every CAMPBELL engagement starts — with finding out what is actually wrong.